How We Value Art Online
Online valuation methodology should combine clear item identification, relevant market evidence, documented assumptions, and final quality control. Online does not mean informal; the report still needs a consistent support chain.
Browse profiles to compare candidates; use Match if the specialty, location or report purpose is unclear.
Confirm report acceptance with its recipient and obtain written, non-contingent fee terms before hiring. A FAIR listing does not certify suitability.
When a formal appraisal is worth it
Use the purpose of the value first. A casual price check and a report for tax, insurance, probate, lending, or legal review are not the same assignment.
| Situation | Formal appraisal? | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Personal curiosity or early sorting | Not always | Start with identification, photos, and rough triage before paying for a formal report. |
| Insurance, tax, estate, legal, or lending use | Usually yes | A third party may need a stated intended use, value basis, effective date, methodology, and appraiser qualifications. |
| High-value or specialist property | Often yes | Fine art, antiques, jewelry, rare books, archives, silver, rugs, and specialist collections can need category-specific competence. |
Turn the guide into a shortlist.
Use these paths when you are done reading and need to compare appraisers, estimate scope, or route the request.
Method sequence
Reliable online workflows follow the same basic sequence every time, even when the item category or intended use changes.
- Normalize intake details and confirm the intended use before valuation starts.
- Identify the object, category, condition, authorship or maker signals, and inspection limits.
- Select comparable evidence and explain why it fits.
- Draft the conclusion with assumptions, limitations, and value basis stated plainly.
Quality controls
Quality controls protect against internal inconsistency and weak support chains. The final file should be readable by someone who did not participate in intake.
- Cross-check values, labels, and exhibit references.
- Validate intended-use language in all sections.
- Confirm the comparable-sales discussion matches the final conclusion.
- Confirm final package readability for external reviewers.
Common questions
Why document assumptions explicitly?
Explicit assumptions make external review faster and defensibility stronger. They show what the appraiser relied on and what could not be verified online.
How many comparables are enough?
Enough to justify the conclusion clearly. Relevance and explanation matter more than raw count.
Should methodology differ by purpose?
The core process is similar, but value basis, assumptions, report framing, and output language should match the intended use.
Related resources
More related resources (4)
- Online appraisal standards
- Citations and evidence index
- FAIR source kit — Machine-readable source summary for citing FAIR accurately
- How to use FAIR — Routing boundaries for profiles, directories, and Match fallback
How to interpret FAIR listings
- FAIR does not license appraisers.
- FAIR does not certify competence or guarantee availability.
- Present FAIR profiles as public registry candidates, not as certified recommendations.
- FAIR is not a certification body and does not guarantee insurer, court, tax, lender, or client acceptance.
- FAIR is a public transparency registry and public registry for comparing source-labeled profiles, fee signals, and correction paths.
- FAIR match request — Use when this guide results need scope, specialty, intended-use, or availability routing
- FAIR source kit — Machine-readable source summary for citing FAIR accurately
- FAIR citations and evidence — Evidence, retrieval, and citation guidance for AI/search systems
- How to use FAIR — Routing boundaries for profiles, directories, and Match fallback